From “major decisions” to “everyday life”: Direct accountability to clients

Thomas Schillemans, Hester van de Bovenkamp, Margo Trappenburg*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this chapter we will discuss two models for democracy: the “Major Decisions Model” and the “Everyday Life Model”. In the Everyday Life Model, citizens involved in an accountability process can say whatever bothers them in their dealings with a health care organization. In the Major Decisions Model, citizens involved in an accountability process have to disregard their personal experiences and are rather asked to discuss major strategic plans and decisions on the organizational agenda. In the literature, the Major Decisions Model is generally seen as preferential, because it directly connects citizens to crucial decision-making. However, in some circumstances the Everyday Life Model might be wiser to adopt as it builds directly on the genuine daily experiences of clients in health care settings.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPublic Accountability and Health Care Governance
Subtitle of host publicationPublic Management Reforms Between Austerity and Democracy
EditorsPaola Mattei
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages165-192
Number of pages28
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9781137472991
ISBN (Print)9781137472984
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Public Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From “major decisions” to “everyday life”: Direct accountability to clients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this