Abstract
“… scientific experiments and direct cinema depend for their success on subjects who have little or nothing to gain from participation”, said Pryluck (1976, p. 260) when addressing, as one of the first, the ethics of direct cinema. This paper argues that the contrary seems to be true. The results of four Dutch case studies of participating in an author documentary project suggest that documentary participants can enjoy their participation and the end product, despite moments of disappointment; that they can learn from the experience, about filmmaking as well as about themselves; and that they can use the experience for self-presentation, despite being represented by the filmmaker. Hence, their participation is complex, and their experiences invite a more profound consideration of the gains and losses of participating.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Jun 2013 |
| Event | European Network for Cinema and Media Studies (NECS) - The Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic Duration: 20 Jun 2013 → 22 Jun 2013 |
Conference
| Conference | European Network for Cinema and Media Studies (NECS) |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Czech Republic |
| City | Prague |
| Period | 20/06/13 → 22/06/13 |
Keywords
- documentary filmmaking
- documentary participant
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From ignorant subject to committed co-creator. Documentary participants’ contributions reconsidered'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver