Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

From ignorant subject to committed co-creator. Documentary participants’ contributions reconsidered

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperOther research output

Abstract

“… scientific experiments and direct cinema depend for their success on subjects who have little or nothing to gain from participation”, said Pryluck (1976, p. 260) when addressing, as one of the first, the ethics of direct cinema. This paper argues that the contrary seems to be true. The results of four Dutch case studies of participating in an author documentary project suggest that documentary participants can enjoy their participation and the end product, despite moments of disappointment; that they can learn from the experience, about filmmaking as well as about themselves; and that they can use the experience for self-presentation, despite being represented by the filmmaker. Hence, their participation is complex, and their experiences invite a more profound consideration of the gains and losses of participating.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages13
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jun 2013
EventEuropean Network for Cinema and Media Studies (NECS) - The Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Duration: 20 Jun 201322 Jun 2013

Conference

ConferenceEuropean Network for Cinema and Media Studies (NECS)
Country/TerritoryCzech Republic
CityPrague
Period20/06/1322/06/13

Keywords

  • documentary filmmaking
  • documentary participant

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From ignorant subject to committed co-creator. Documentary participants’ contributions reconsidered'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this