Abstract
We bring together two lines of research. The first is that of so-called HAVE-verbs, which come with the peculiarity of allowing for bare
nominal objects in Norwegian, Catalan, Romanian, etc. These languages normally impose the use of articles in argument position and
don’t have a generalized incorporation option. The second is that of HAVE itself, a verb that has been claimed to select (predicative)
relations rather than arguments in many languages including English. We argue that the literature on relational HAVE provides the key to
understanding why HAVE-verbs behave as incorporation verbs. We further show how a unified analysis sheds light on the scopal
properties of relational HAVE.
nominal objects in Norwegian, Catalan, Romanian, etc. These languages normally impose the use of articles in argument position and
don’t have a generalized incorporation option. The second is that of HAVE itself, a verb that has been claimed to select (predicative)
relations rather than arguments in many languages including English. We argue that the literature on relational HAVE provides the key to
understanding why HAVE-verbs behave as incorporation verbs. We further show how a unified analysis sheds light on the scopal
properties of relational HAVE.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 49-68 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Lingua |
| Volume | 182 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2016 |
Keywords
- possession
- bare
- incorporation
- Possession/relationality
- HAVE
- Qualia Structure
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From HAVE to HAVE verbs: relations and incorporation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver