Framing community resilience through mobility and gender

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    The study of community resilience observed in times of
    crisis has conventionally focused on the impact of external
    forces on sedentary and homogeneous communities
    embedded in specific ecological systems. Drawing
    on a qualitative case study of a rural community
    in northern Ghana, this paper reports that, even
    in a community of mostly small farmers, diversifying
    livelihoods is apparently a main coping strategy. This
    paper focuses on two, often overlooked, dimensions
    that underpin this livelihood diversification: mobility
    and gender. Mobility, the first dimension, indicates
    the work of livelihoods that develop outside the community
    such as the so-called “settler farming,” a variety
    of trading activities, and outmigration to cities.
    Gender, the second dimension, indicates cropping and
    commercial activities carried out differently by men
    and women. Both mobility and gender characterize
    diverse livelihood strategies, which evolve by enriching
    social relationships and extending networks. This paper
    argues that shedding light on social relationships
    and networks helps us to reframe the concept of community
    resilience from the community-based capacity
    of self-organization to the capacity of a flexible social
    system for being able to mobilize a wide variety of resources.
    Future research agendas must advance this
    understanding of resource mobilization in relation to
    ecological resilience and must clarify its technological
    and policy implications.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)554-562
    JournalJournal of Disaster Research
    Volume9
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • community resilience
    • gender
    • livelihood diversification
    • mobility
    • network
    • social relationship

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Framing community resilience through mobility and gender'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this