TY - JOUR
T1 - Forests, savannas and grasslands: bridging the knowledge gap between ecology and Dynamic Global Vegetation Models
AU - Baudena, M.
AU - Dekker, S. C.
AU - van Bodegom, P. M.
AU - Cuesta, B.
AU - Higgins, S. I.
AU - Lehsten, V.
AU - Reick, C. H.
AU - Rietkerk, M.
AU - Scheiter, S.
AU - Yin, Z.
AU - Zavala, M. A.
AU - Brovkin, V.
PY - 2014/6/1
Y1 - 2014/6/1
N2 - The forest, savanna, and grassland biomes, and the transitions between
them, are expected to undergo major changes in the future, due to global
climate change. Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs) are very useful
to understand vegetation dynamics under present climate, and to predict
its changes under future conditions. However, several DGVMs display high
uncertainty in predicting vegetation in tropical areas. Here we perform
a comparative analysis of three different DGVMs (JSBACH,
LPJ-GUESS-SPITFIRE and aDGVM) with regard to their representation of the
ecological mechanisms and feedbacks that determine the forest, savanna
and grassland biomes, in an attempt to bridge the knowledge gap between
ecology and global modelling. Model outcomes, obtained including
different mechanisms, are compared to observed tree cover along a mean
annual precipitation gradient in Africa. Through these comparisons, and
by drawing on the large number of recent studies that have delivered new
insights into the ecology of tropical ecosystems in general, and of
savannas in particular, we identify two main mechanisms that need an
improved representation in the DGVMs. The first mechanism includes water
limitation to tree growth, and tree-grass competition for water, which
are key factors in determining savanna presence in arid and semi-arid
areas. The second is a grass-fire feedback, which maintains both forest
and savanna occurrences in mesic areas. Grasses constitute the majority
of the fuel load, and at the same time benefit from the openness of the
landscape after fires, since they recover faster than trees.
Additionally, these two mechanisms are better represented when the
models also include tree life stages (adults and seedlings), and
distinguish between fire-prone and shade-tolerant savanna trees, and
fire-resistant and shade-intolerant forest trees. Including these basic
elements could improve the predictive ability of the DGVMs, not only
under current climate conditions but also and especially under future
scenarios.
AB - The forest, savanna, and grassland biomes, and the transitions between
them, are expected to undergo major changes in the future, due to global
climate change. Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs) are very useful
to understand vegetation dynamics under present climate, and to predict
its changes under future conditions. However, several DGVMs display high
uncertainty in predicting vegetation in tropical areas. Here we perform
a comparative analysis of three different DGVMs (JSBACH,
LPJ-GUESS-SPITFIRE and aDGVM) with regard to their representation of the
ecological mechanisms and feedbacks that determine the forest, savanna
and grassland biomes, in an attempt to bridge the knowledge gap between
ecology and global modelling. Model outcomes, obtained including
different mechanisms, are compared to observed tree cover along a mean
annual precipitation gradient in Africa. Through these comparisons, and
by drawing on the large number of recent studies that have delivered new
insights into the ecology of tropical ecosystems in general, and of
savannas in particular, we identify two main mechanisms that need an
improved representation in the DGVMs. The first mechanism includes water
limitation to tree growth, and tree-grass competition for water, which
are key factors in determining savanna presence in arid and semi-arid
areas. The second is a grass-fire feedback, which maintains both forest
and savanna occurrences in mesic areas. Grasses constitute the majority
of the fuel load, and at the same time benefit from the openness of the
landscape after fires, since they recover faster than trees.
Additionally, these two mechanisms are better represented when the
models also include tree life stages (adults and seedlings), and
distinguish between fire-prone and shade-tolerant savanna trees, and
fire-resistant and shade-intolerant forest trees. Including these basic
elements could improve the predictive ability of the DGVMs, not only
under current climate conditions but also and especially under future
scenarios.
U2 - 10.5194/bgd-11-9471-2014
DO - 10.5194/bgd-11-9471-2014
M3 - Article
SN - 1810-6277
VL - 11
SP - 9471
EP - 9510
JO - Biogeosciences Discussions
JF - Biogeosciences Discussions
IS - 6
ER -