Abstract
This contribution discusses the tensions of legitimacy in flood risk management resulting from the claim for more flood resilience. Interviews with stakeholders all over the Netherlands confirmed a change in the way water management and the management of floods in particular has been gradually changing over the past decades: There is a shift from a predominantly interest- and representation-based perspective on legitimation towards a more inclusive, horizontal, bottom-up, interactive perspective that takes multiple stakeholders and multiple issues into account (e.g., a new perspective of governance regarding the management of floods). In other words, an evolvement from resistance-based flood protection to a more resilient flood risk management paradigm, which challenges the common way of legitimization. Input and output legitimacy are complemented by an extra component of throughput-legitimacy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Governing for Resilience in Vulnerable Places |
| Editors | Elen-Maarja Trell, Britta Restemeyer, Melanie M. Bakema, Bettina van Hoven |
| Place of Publication | Abingdon |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Pages | 77–91 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781315103761 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781138216495 |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Flood resilience and legitimacy: an exploration of Dutch flood risk management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver