Final dispute settlement in numbers: Report of an examination of final dispute settlement in the Utrecht District Court

Paulien Willemsen; Rick Busscher; Niels Groot; Philip Langbroek; Linnea Langerak

Final dispute settlement in numbers: Report of an examination of final dispute settlement in the Utrecht District Court

Paulien Willemsen^*, Rick Busscher, Niels Groot, Philip Langbroek, Linnea Langerak

^*Corresponding author for this work

Rule of Law and Administration of Justice (Montaigne)

Utrecht University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

In the Netherlands the administrative court sometimes has the possibility to settle the case without jeopardizing the separation of administrative and judicial responsibilities based on the separation of powers doctrine. This paper addresses the question of how often administrative courts use the powers they currently have for final settlement of disputes and whether they make optimal use of these powers.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	129-146
Number of pages	18
Journal	Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
Issue number	28 E
Publication status	Published - 2009

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Cite this

@article{90d7f4a4d8aa405cab720c3507ea3e72,

title = "Final dispute settlement in numbers: Report of an examination of final dispute settlement in the Utrecht District Court",

abstract = "In the Netherlands the administrative court sometimes has the possibility to settle the case without jeopardizing the separation of administrative and judicial responsibilities based on the separation of powers doctrine. This paper addresses the question of how often administrative courts use the powers they currently have for final settlement of disputes and whether they make optimal use of these powers.",

author = "Paulien Willemsen and Rick Busscher and Niels Groot and Philip Langbroek and Linnea Langerak",

year = "2009",

language = "English",

pages = "129--146",

journal = "Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences",

issn = "1842-2845",

publisher = "Universitatea Babes-Bolyai",

number = "28 E",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Final dispute settlement in numbers

T2 - Report of an examination of final dispute settlement in the Utrecht District Court

AU - Willemsen, Paulien

AU - Busscher, Rick

AU - Groot, Niels

AU - Langbroek, Philip

AU - Langerak, Linnea

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - In the Netherlands the administrative court sometimes has the possibility to settle the case without jeopardizing the separation of administrative and judicial responsibilities based on the separation of powers doctrine. This paper addresses the question of how often administrative courts use the powers they currently have for final settlement of disputes and whether they make optimal use of these powers.

AB - In the Netherlands the administrative court sometimes has the possibility to settle the case without jeopardizing the separation of administrative and judicial responsibilities based on the separation of powers doctrine. This paper addresses the question of how often administrative courts use the powers they currently have for final settlement of disputes and whether they make optimal use of these powers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649119064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77649119064

SN - 1842-2845

SP - 129

EP - 146

JO - Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences

JF - Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences

IS - 28 E

ER -

Final dispute settlement in numbers: Report of an examination of final dispute settlement in the Utrecht District Court

Abstract

UN SDGs

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this