Abstract
This essay argues for a connection between studying the history of geography as an academic discipline and the research experiences and knowledge productions of undergraduate geography students. The whereabouts of undergraduate dissertation research and the conceptions of what the field actually constitutes shapes geography students’ perceptions of the discipline, and thus affects shifts in what future and novice practitioners see as geography, or geographical knowledge. When comparing the local educational versions of academic geography taught at one university to more traditional, perhaps canonical, narratives on the history of geography, it becomes obvious that although there are many similarities, the timelines between disciplinary trends and educational practices never fully match.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 33-35 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Journal of Historical Geography |
| Volume | 85 |
| Early online date | 21 Apr 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 The Author
Funding
This research was funded by a Doctoral Scholarship provided by The Leverhulme Trust.
| Funders |
|---|
| Leverhulme Trust |
Keywords
- Dissertations
- Fieldwork
- Geography education
- Geography students
- History of geography
- Knowledge production