Abstract
The objective was to compare pregnancy per service event (P/S) in lactating dairy cows following timed artificial insemination (AI) or timed embryo transfer (ET) using either fresh or frozen in vitro–produced embryos. Oocytes were collected once per week for up to 9 wk using transvaginal ovum pick-up from elite dairy donors (ET-DAIRY; n = 40; Holstein-Friesian and Jersey) and elite beef donors (ET-ELITE-BEEF; n = 21; Angus). Both ET-DAIRY and ET-ELITE-BEEF donors consisted of heifers and cows. In addition, oocytes were collected from the ovaries of beef heifers of known pedigree following slaughter at a commercial abattoir (ET-COMM-BEEF; n = 119). Following in vitro maturation and fertilization, presumptive zygotes were cultured in vitro to the blastocyst stage. Grade 1 blastocysts were either transferred fresh or frozen for on-farm thawing and direct transfer. A total of 1,106 recipient cows (all lactating, predominantly Holstein-Friesian) located on 16 herdlets were blocked based on parity, calving date, and Economic Breeding Index, and randomly assigned to receive AI (n = 243) or ET (n = 863) after estrous synchronization with a 10-d Progesterone-synch protocol. Cows assigned to ET were further randomized to receive fresh (n = 187) or frozen (n = 178) ET-ELITE-BEEF embryos, fresh (n = 169) or frozen (n = 162) ET-DAIRY embryos, or fresh (n = 80) or frozen (n = 87) ET-COMM-BEEF embryos. Pregnancy was diagnosed using transrectal ultrasound on d 32 to 35 after synchronized ovulation and confirmed on d 62 to 65, at which time fetal sex was determined. Pregnancy per service event at d 32 was not different between AI (48.8%) and ET (48.9%) and did not differ between dairy and beef embryos (50.3% vs. 48.1%, respectively). However, P/S was less on d 32 following transfer of frozen embryos (41.6%) compared with fresh embryos (56.1%). Pregnancy loss between d 32 and 62 was greater for ET (15.1%) compared with AI (4.7%), with greater losses observed for frozen beef (18.5%), fresh beef (17.3%), and frozen dairy (19.2%) compared with fresh dairy (6.0%) embryos. Serum progesterone (P4) concentration on d 7 was associated with P/S at d 32 and 62. Cows in the quartile with the least serum P4 concentrations (quartile 1) had less probability of being pregnant on d 32 (33.4%) compared with cows in the 3 upper quartiles for serum P4 (45.7%, 55.6%, and 61.2% for quartile 2, quartile 3, and quartile 4, respectively). Sex ratio (male:female) at d 62 was skewed toward more male fetuses following ET (61.1:38.9) compared with AI (43.2:56.8) and was consistent with the sex ratio among in vitro blastocysts (61.2:38.8). In conclusion, P/S was similar for AI and ET, although pregnancy loss between d 32 and 62 was greater for ET than for AI.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1788-1804 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Dairy Science |
Volume | 107 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 6 Oct 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2024 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 American Dairy Science Association
Funding
The authors' work is funded by the Teagasc Walsh Scholarships Program, The Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (Dublin, Ireland) Research Stimulus Fund (Grant 2021R665), Science Foundation Ireland (Grant 16/IA/4474), as well as funding from a research grant from Science Foundation Ireland and the Department of Agriculture, Food and Marine (Grant 16/RC/3835; VistaMilk). Funding from the Dairy Levy Trust (Dublin, Ireland) and FBD Trust (Dublin, Ireland) is gratefully acknowledged. M. B. Rabaglino was supported by an Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Individual Fellowship (Proposal 101021311; Brussels, Belgium). The authors thank the staff and students at Teagasc Moorepark (Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland) for help in sample collection. Ceva Santé Animale (Bordeaux, France) provided the pharmaceuticals used in estrous synchronization. We gratefully acknowledge the collection of ovaries from beef heifers post-slaughter by ABP Food Group (Waterford, Ireland). Thanks also go to Beatriz Fernández-Fuertes (Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [INIA-CSIC], Madrid, Spain) for assistance with the design of Figure 1. The authors have not stated any conflicts of interest.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Dairy Levy Trust | |
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (Dublin, Ireland) Research Stimulus Fund | 2021R665 |
FBD Trust | |
INIA-CSIC | |
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas | |
Teagasc Moorepark | |
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions | 101021311 |
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions | |
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Ireland | 16/RC/3835 |
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Ireland | |
Science Foundation Ireland | 16/IA/4474 |
Science Foundation Ireland |
Keywords
- assisted reproductive technology
- bovine
- dairy-beef integration
- in vitro fertilization