Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Fear conditioning of SCR but not the startle reflex requires conscious discrimination of threat and safety

  • Dieuwke Sevenster
  • , Tom Beckers
  • , Merel Kindt*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Academic Medical Center
  • KU Leuven

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

There is conflicting evidence as to whether awareness is required for conditioning of the skin conductance response (SCR). Recently, Schultz and Helmstetter (2010) reported SCR conditioning in contingency unaware participants by using difficult to discriminate stimuli. These findings are in stark contrast with other observations in human fear conditioning research, showing that SCR predominantly reflects contingency learning. Therefore, we repeated the study by Schultz and Helmstetter and additionally measured conditioning of the startle response, which seems to be less sensitive to declarative knowledge than SCR. While we solely observed SCR conditioning in participants who reported awareness of the contingencies (n = 16) and not in the unaware participants (n = 18), we observed startle conditioning irrespective of awareness. We conclude that SCR but not startle conditioning depends on conscious discriminative fear learning.

Original languageEnglish
Article number32
JournalFrontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience [E]
Volume8
Issue numberFEB
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Awareness
  • Contingency learning
  • Fear conditioning
  • Fear potentiated startle
  • Skin conductance response

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fear conditioning of SCR but not the startle reflex requires conscious discrimination of threat and safety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this