Abstract
Irrespective of the precision, the inaccuracy of a pupil-based eye tracker is about 0.5∘. This paper delves into two factors that potentially increase the inaccuracy of the gaze signal, namely, 1) Pupil-size changes and the pupil-size artefact (PSA) and 2) the putative inability of experienced individuals to precisely refixate a visual target. Experiment 1 utilizes a traditional pupil-CR eye tracker, while Experiment 2 employs a retinal eye tracker, the FreezeEye tracker, eliminating the pupil-based estimation. Results reveal that the PSA significantly affects gaze accuracy, introducing up to 0.5∘ inaccuracies during calibration and validation. Corrections based on the relation between pupil size and apparent gaze shift substantially reduce inaccuracies, underscoring the PSA’s influence on eye-tracking quality. Conversely, Experiment 2 demonstrates humans’ precise refixation abilities, suggesting that the accuracy of the gaze signal is not limited by human refixation inconsistencies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 23 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Behavior Research Methods |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2024.
Keywords
- Accuracy
- Calibration
- Pupil size artefact
- Pupil-CR eye tracker
- Retinal eye tracker
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Eye tracker calibration: How well can humans refixate a target?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver