Abstract
Transplantations of organisms in aquatic ecosystems play an important role in ecological restoration and commercial practices. However, success rates of these transplantations, especially when ecosystem engineers are involved, are often low. To enhance transplantation success, the promotion of self-facilitation between transplants that mitigate environmental stressors is crucial. Besides, spatial patterns resulting from self-facilitation can enhance ecosystem resilience. Using blue mussels as a model organism, we explored the possibility of increasing transplantation success in a subtidal ecosystem. We used biodegradable structures (“BioShell-SMCs”) to ameliorate self-facilitating feedback mechanisms to overcome environmental stressors in the initial post-transplantation phase, and to increase transplantation success by implementing large-scale spatial configurations, mimicking natural mussel bed patterns. The structures are an innovation of traditional seed mussel collectors (SMCs) used in mussel cultivation. They consist of a biodegradable net based on a compound of aliphatic polyesters, filled with empty cockle shells around a coconut fiber rope. We tested whether different spatial configurations could increase transplantation success of mussel seed: low versus high density labyrinth pattern and banded pattern. The results of this experiment showed high losses (approximately 75%), with no significant variation between configurations. The lack of migration due to unexpected retention of the biodegradable net hindered the initiation of natural aggregations, resulting in increased competition among mussels. Besides, factors such as hydrodynamic dislodgement, burial and interannual variation likely contributed to the observed losses. While the BioShell-SMC has not demonstrated large-scale success, this research contributes to understanding the mechanisms that underlie successful transplantation strategies in aquatic ecosystems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e14095 |
| Journal | Restoration Ecology |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 The Authors. Restoration Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration.
Funding
We thank all the colleagues, students, and volunteers who helped us in setting up and monitoring the experiment. We thank Machine-factory Bakker B.V. for the delivery of the BioShell-SMCs and Senbis for the development of the biodegradable nets. We thank the mussel producer Steketee (YE72) for the use of their seed collector system and mussel cultivation plot. We are grateful for the help of H. Nelis with deployment of the BioShell-SMCs. We would also like to thank J. de Ruiter for his valuable contribution to the sonar analyses. The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) provided funding for this project: "BioCollect" (18525).
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) | |
| ???publication-publication-funding-organisation-not-added??? | 18525 |
Keywords
- configurations
- ecosystem engineers
- Mytilus edulis
- positive feedback
- transplantation
- window of opportunity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the impact of spatial patterns on restoration efforts: promoting self-facilitating feedback mechanisms with an innovative biodegradable seed mussel collector'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver