TY - JOUR
T1 - Explicit Relationship Agreements and HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use by Gay and Bisexual Men in Relationships
AU - MacGibbon, James
AU - Bavinton, Benjamin R.
AU - Drysdale, Kerryn
AU - Murphy, Dean
AU - Broady, Timothy R.
AU - Kolstee, Johann
AU - Molyneux, Angus
AU - Power, Cherie
AU - Paynter, Heath
AU - de Wit, John
AU - Holt, Martin
N1 - Funding Information:
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. The PrEPARE Project is supported by the BBV & STI Research, Intervention and Strategic Evaluation Program of the New South Wales Ministry of Health, and surveillance funding from the Australian Government Department of Health. The Centre for Social Research in Health and Kirby Institute receive funding from the Australian Government Department of Health. JM is in receipt of an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. No pharmaceutical funding was received for this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Relationship agreements are important for HIV prevention among gay and bisexual men (GBM) in relationships, with research earlier in the HIV epidemic often finding that agreements specified monogamy or condom use with casual partners. There is evidence that HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has shifted sexual practices among some men in relationships, such as allowing condomless sex with casual partners, but there has been little attention paid to relationship agreements among GBM who use PrEP. In this paper, we analyzed national, Australian, cross-sectional data from an online survey completed by non-HIV-positive GBM in 2021 (N = 1,185). Using logistic regression, we identified demographic characteristics, sexual practices and the types of relationship agreement that were associated with PrEP use among GBM in relationships. Using Pearson’s chi-squared tests, we explored whether PrEP users in relationships reported similar sexual practices to PrEP users not in relationships. PrEP use among GBM in relationships was independently associated with older age, identifying as gay, being in a non-monogamous relationship, having a spoken (explicit) relationship agreement, having a primary HIV-negative partner taking PrEP or a primary partner living with HIV, reporting recent condomless casual sex, reporting an STI diagnosis in the past year, and knowing at least one other PrEP user. We found that PrEP users in relationships had similar sexual practices to PrEP users not in relationships. GBM in relationships who have casual sex and who meet PrEP suitability criteria may be good candidates for PrEP. Our findings suggest that explicit relationship agreements remain important for HIV prevention, and they support PrEP use among GBM in relationships.
AB - Relationship agreements are important for HIV prevention among gay and bisexual men (GBM) in relationships, with research earlier in the HIV epidemic often finding that agreements specified monogamy or condom use with casual partners. There is evidence that HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has shifted sexual practices among some men in relationships, such as allowing condomless sex with casual partners, but there has been little attention paid to relationship agreements among GBM who use PrEP. In this paper, we analyzed national, Australian, cross-sectional data from an online survey completed by non-HIV-positive GBM in 2021 (N = 1,185). Using logistic regression, we identified demographic characteristics, sexual practices and the types of relationship agreement that were associated with PrEP use among GBM in relationships. Using Pearson’s chi-squared tests, we explored whether PrEP users in relationships reported similar sexual practices to PrEP users not in relationships. PrEP use among GBM in relationships was independently associated with older age, identifying as gay, being in a non-monogamous relationship, having a spoken (explicit) relationship agreement, having a primary HIV-negative partner taking PrEP or a primary partner living with HIV, reporting recent condomless casual sex, reporting an STI diagnosis in the past year, and knowing at least one other PrEP user. We found that PrEP users in relationships had similar sexual practices to PrEP users not in relationships. GBM in relationships who have casual sex and who meet PrEP suitability criteria may be good candidates for PrEP. Our findings suggest that explicit relationship agreements remain important for HIV prevention, and they support PrEP use among GBM in relationships.
KW - Australia
KW - HIV PrEP
KW - HIV prevention
KW - Male couples
KW - Men who have sex with men
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135751452&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10508-022-02382-9
DO - 10.1007/s10508-022-02382-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 35939159
AN - SCOPUS:85135751452
SN - 0004-0002
VL - 52
SP - 761
EP - 771
JO - Archives of Sexual Behavior
JF - Archives of Sexual Behavior
IS - 2
ER -