Experiences in Close Relationships Revised Child version (ECR-RC): Psychometric evidence in support of a Security Factor

Francesca Lionetti, S. Mastrotheodoros, Benedetta Emanuella Palladino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Attachment refers to the innate tendency to form strong and close interpersonal bonds, from infancy through adulthood. Many different ways to assess attachment have been developed, one of them being the use of self-report questionnaires. The Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised is one of the most commonly used instruments to assess adult and late adolescent attachment. Recently, a new and brief child version of this instrument has been published, the 12-item ECR-RC short form. The purpose of the current study was threefold: (1) to test the factorial structure of this form in a sample of Italian adolescents, (2) to test the loadings overlap between the mother and the father forms, and (3) to investigate factors reliability. Using a sample of 961 adolescents (Mage = 14.25, SDage = 1.57), a series of Confirmatory Factor Analyses were performed. The Avoidance – Anxiety structure was not supported, whereas a factor structure including Anxiety, Avoidance, and Security, had a very good fit. Item loadings on these factors were largely equal across mother and father, and internal reliability was high. The results of this study show that the ECR-RC short form is a quick and reliable way to assess attachment in early adolescents. This study also initiates the proposal of an ECR-RC Security factor, to be further validated in future studies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)452-463
JournalEuropean Journal of Developmental Psychology
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • ECR-RC
  • attachment
  • adolescents
  • Italian sample
  • confirmatory factor analysis
  • psychometric proprieties

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Experiences in Close Relationships Revised Child version (ECR-RC): Psychometric evidence in support of a Security Factor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this