Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments: Special issue Methodologies for Research on Legal Argumentation

F.J. Bex; Viola Bex-Reimert

doi:10.22329/il.v36i3.4723

Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments: Special issue Methodologies for Research on Legal Argumentation

F.J. Bex, Viola Bex-Reimert

University of Groningen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

In this article, we aim analyse whether a systematic method for reasoning with evidence in legal cases – the hybrid theory of stories and arguments – can be applied to a novel legal domain, namely European asylum law. This analysis serves as a case study for testing the applicability of the hybrid theory outside of the context of criminal law. Furthermore, the analysis will provide insights on how the hybrid theory can be used to improve the normative framework for evidence assessment in asylum cases.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	349-370
Number of pages	15
Journal	Informal Logic
Volume	36
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v36i3.4723
Publication status	Published - 2016

Keywords

evidence
rgumentation
asylum cases

Access to Document

10.22329/il.v36i3.4723

InfLogicSI-FJB-1.1Final published version, 292 KBLicence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{2b3e0b1b49f24662ba61e120925b4267,

title = "Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments: Special issue Methodologies for Research on Legal Argumentation",

abstract = "In this article, we aim analyse whether a systematic method for reasoning with evidence in legal cases – the hybrid theory of stories and arguments – can be applied to a novel legal domain, namely European asylum law. This analysis serves as a case study for testing the applicability of the hybrid theory outside of the context of criminal law. Furthermore, the analysis will provide insights on how the hybrid theory can be used to improve the normative framework for evidence assessment in asylum cases.",

keywords = "evidence , rgumentation, asylum cases",

author = "F.J. Bex and Viola Bex-Reimert",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.22329/il.v36i3.4723",

language = "English",

volume = "36",

pages = "349--370",

journal = "Informal Logic",

issn = "0824-2577",

publisher = "University of Windsor",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments

T2 - Special issue Methodologies for Research on Legal Argumentation

AU - Bex, F.J.

AU - Bex-Reimert, Viola

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - In this article, we aim analyse whether a systematic method for reasoning with evidence in legal cases – the hybrid theory of stories and arguments – can be applied to a novel legal domain, namely European asylum law. This analysis serves as a case study for testing the applicability of the hybrid theory outside of the context of criminal law. Furthermore, the analysis will provide insights on how the hybrid theory can be used to improve the normative framework for evidence assessment in asylum cases.

AB - In this article, we aim analyse whether a systematic method for reasoning with evidence in legal cases – the hybrid theory of stories and arguments – can be applied to a novel legal domain, namely European asylum law. This analysis serves as a case study for testing the applicability of the hybrid theory outside of the context of criminal law. Furthermore, the analysis will provide insights on how the hybrid theory can be used to improve the normative framework for evidence assessment in asylum cases.

KW - evidence

KW - rgumentation

KW - asylum cases

U2 - 10.22329/il.v36i3.4723

DO - 10.22329/il.v36i3.4723

M3 - Article

SN - 0824-2577

VL - 36

SP - 349

EP - 370

JO - Informal Logic

JF - Informal Logic

IS - 3

ER -

Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments: Special issue Methodologies for Research on Legal Argumentation

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this