Evaluative conversations: Translating between diverse stakeholders in regional RRI projects

Tjitske Holtrop; Ingeborg Meijer; Paula Otero-Hermida; Anestis Amanatidis; Chiara Buongiovanni; Donatella Casale; Claudia Colonnello; Alessandro Deserti; Fabio Feudi; Alan Hartmann; Marianne Hörlesberger; Ildiko M. Ipolyi; Nhien Nguyen; Mika Nieminen; Gabriele Quinti; Tine Ravn; Francesca Rizzo; Felicitas Schmittinger; Norbert Steinhaus; Roger Strand; Thomas Völker; René Wintjes; Emad Yagmaei

doi:10.22163/fteval.2022.544

Evaluative conversations: Translating between diverse stakeholders in regional RRI projects

Tjitske Holtrop, Ingeborg Meijer, Paula Otero-Hermida, Anestis Amanatidis, Chiara Buongiovanni, Donatella Casale, Claudia Colonnello, Alessandro Deserti, Fabio Feudi, Alan Hartmann, Marianne Hörlesberger, Ildiko M. Ipolyi, Nhien Nguyen, Mika Nieminen, Gabriele Quinti, Tine Ravn, Francesca Rizzo, Felicitas Schmittinger, Norbert Steinhaus, Roger StrandThomas Völker, René Wintjes, Emad Yagmaei

Maastricht University Medical Centre

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Since the summer of 2020, researchers from ten projects pertaining to the Horizon2020 Science with and for Society (SwafS) call have been meeting virtually as the SwafS14 Monitoring and Evaluation ecosystem. Topics of discussion were the trials and tribulations of their regional Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) projects as well as their strategies for monitoring and evaluation. In this paper we make a first attempt at presenting these issues as problems of
translation between different kinds of stakeholders. After an exploration
of the diversity of stakeholders and the process of translation in regional
RRI, we suggest evaluative conversations as a way of improving regional
RRI. We intend to develop this idea in the future and that these conversations will facilitate more responsible and engaged monitoring and evaluation and contribute to better R&I policies

Original language	English
Number of pages	77
Journal	fteval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation
Volume	53
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2022.544
Publication status	Published - Apr 2022
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

evaluation practices
RRI
SwafS
translation
stakeholders

Access to Document

10.22163/fteval.2022.544

Cite this

Holtrop, T., Meijer, I., Otero-Hermida, P., Amanatidis, A., Buongiovanni, C., Casale, D., Colonnello, C., Deserti, A., Feudi, F., Hartmann, A., Hörlesberger, M., Ipolyi, I. M., Nguyen, N., Nieminen, M., Quinti, G., Ravn, T., Rizzo, F., Schmittinger, F., Steinhaus, N., ... Yagmaei, E. (2022). Evaluative conversations: Translating between diverse stakeholders in regional RRI projects. fteval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, 53. https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2022.544

@article{e58e929ad3cc49229b9b5997499c55ec,

title = "Evaluative conversations: Translating between diverse stakeholders in regional RRI projects",

abstract = "Since the summer of 2020, researchers from ten projects pertaining to the Horizon2020 Science with and for Society (SwafS) call have been meeting virtually as the SwafS14 Monitoring and Evaluation ecosystem. Topics of discussion were the trials and tribulations of their regional Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) projects as well as their strategies for monitoring and evaluation. In this paper we make a first attempt at presenting these issues as problems oftranslation between different kinds of stakeholders. After an explorationof the diversity of stakeholders and the process of translation in regionalRRI, we suggest evaluative conversations as a way of improving regionalRRI. We intend to develop this idea in the future and that these conversations will facilitate more responsible and engaged monitoring and evaluation and contribute to better R&I policies",

keywords = "evaluation practices, RRI, SwafS, translation, stakeholders",

author = "Tjitske Holtrop and Ingeborg Meijer and Paula Otero-Hermida and Anestis Amanatidis and Chiara Buongiovanni and Donatella Casale and Claudia Colonnello and Alessandro Deserti and Fabio Feudi and Alan Hartmann and Marianne H{\"o}rlesberger and Ipolyi, {Ildiko M.} and Nhien Nguyen and Mika Nieminen and Gabriele Quinti and Tine Ravn and Francesca Rizzo and Felicitas Schmittinger and Norbert Steinhaus and Roger Strand and Thomas V{\"o}lker and Ren{\'e} Wintjes and Emad Yagmaei",

year = "2022",

month = apr,

doi = "10.22163/fteval.2022.544",

language = "English",

volume = "53",

journal = "fteval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation",

issn = "1726-6629",

}

Holtrop, T, Meijer, I, Otero-Hermida, P, Amanatidis, A, Buongiovanni, C, Casale, D, Colonnello, C, Deserti, A, Feudi, F, Hartmann, A, Hörlesberger, M, Ipolyi, IM, Nguyen, N, Nieminen, M, Quinti, G, Ravn, T, Rizzo, F, Schmittinger, F, Steinhaus, N, Strand, R, Völker, T, Wintjes, R & Yagmaei, E 2022, 'Evaluative conversations: Translating between diverse stakeholders in regional RRI projects', fteval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, vol. 53. https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2022.544

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluative conversations: Translating between diverse stakeholders in regional RRI projects

AU - Holtrop, Tjitske

AU - Meijer, Ingeborg

AU - Otero-Hermida, Paula

AU - Amanatidis, Anestis

AU - Buongiovanni, Chiara

AU - Casale, Donatella

AU - Colonnello, Claudia

AU - Deserti, Alessandro

AU - Feudi, Fabio

AU - Hartmann, Alan

AU - Hörlesberger, Marianne

AU - Ipolyi, Ildiko M.

AU - Nguyen, Nhien

AU - Nieminen, Mika

AU - Quinti, Gabriele

AU - Ravn, Tine

AU - Rizzo, Francesca

AU - Schmittinger, Felicitas

AU - Steinhaus, Norbert

AU - Strand, Roger

AU - Völker, Thomas

AU - Wintjes, René

AU - Yagmaei, Emad

PY - 2022/4

Y1 - 2022/4

N2 - Since the summer of 2020, researchers from ten projects pertaining to the Horizon2020 Science with and for Society (SwafS) call have been meeting virtually as the SwafS14 Monitoring and Evaluation ecosystem. Topics of discussion were the trials and tribulations of their regional Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) projects as well as their strategies for monitoring and evaluation. In this paper we make a first attempt at presenting these issues as problems oftranslation between different kinds of stakeholders. After an explorationof the diversity of stakeholders and the process of translation in regionalRRI, we suggest evaluative conversations as a way of improving regionalRRI. We intend to develop this idea in the future and that these conversations will facilitate more responsible and engaged monitoring and evaluation and contribute to better R&I policies

AB - Since the summer of 2020, researchers from ten projects pertaining to the Horizon2020 Science with and for Society (SwafS) call have been meeting virtually as the SwafS14 Monitoring and Evaluation ecosystem. Topics of discussion were the trials and tribulations of their regional Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) projects as well as their strategies for monitoring and evaluation. In this paper we make a first attempt at presenting these issues as problems oftranslation between different kinds of stakeholders. After an explorationof the diversity of stakeholders and the process of translation in regionalRRI, we suggest evaluative conversations as a way of improving regionalRRI. We intend to develop this idea in the future and that these conversations will facilitate more responsible and engaged monitoring and evaluation and contribute to better R&I policies

KW - evaluation practices

KW - RRI

KW - SwafS

KW - translation

KW - stakeholders

U2 - 10.22163/fteval.2022.544

DO - 10.22163/fteval.2022.544

M3 - Article

SN - 1726-6629

VL - 53

JO - fteval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation

JF - fteval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation

ER -

Evaluative conversations: Translating between diverse stakeholders in regional RRI projects

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this