Evaluation of Surgical Technique and Clinical Results of a Procedure-Specific Fixation Method for Tibial Tuberosity Transposition in Dogs: 37 Cases

D. Onis*, Jessica Entoft, Erik Wouters, Ditte Skytte, Karin Staal-Bruining, Hans Vernooij, Björn Meij

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to describe the use of a procedure-specific fixation method for tibial tuberosity transposition and report clinical outcome.
Study Design This is a multi-institutional case series, evaluating 37 cases that were treated surgically for medial patellar luxation (MPL) and in which the tibial tuberosity transposition (TTT) was performed using the Rapid Luxation Plating System (RLPS). Surgical technique, implants, clinical outcome, and complications are reported.
Results Surgery was successfully performed in dogs weighing 2.5 to 36.2 kg. Postoperative minor complications occurred in 13 cases (35%) and major complications occurred in 3 cases (8%). No implant-related complications or tibial tuberosity avulsions or fractures were seen. Outcome related to surgery was good or excellent in all cases.
Conclusion The RLPS for TTT provides a feasible technique in a large range of patients with MPL and lowers the occurrence of implant-related complications and tibial tuberosity avulsion or fracture.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)266-272
Number of pages7
JournalVeterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Volume36
Issue number5
Early online date19 Jun 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • rapid luxation plating system
  • tibial tuberosity transposition
  • medial patellar luxation
  • dog
  • implant

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of Surgical Technique and Clinical Results of a Procedure-Specific Fixation Method for Tibial Tuberosity Transposition in Dogs: 37 Cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this