Evaluation of secondary structure predictions in proteins

Johannes A. Lenstra*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Data of 33 proteins are used to compare four methods which predict secondary structure from the amino acid sequence. The prediction of α-helices according to the histogram method of Argos et al. (Argos, P., Schwarz, J. and Schwarz, J. (1976) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 439, 261-273) is on the average as reliable as the statistical method of Nagano (Nagano, K. (1973) J. Mol. Biol. 75, 401-420). Both methods predict helices more accurately than the stereochemical method of Lim (Lim, V.I. (1974) J. Mol. Biol. 88, 873-894). The method of Nagano yields the best prediction of β-structure, while the β-structure predictions of Lim and Argos et al. are not significantly different. The results of the α-helix and β-structure predictions according to the statistical mechanical method of Tanaka and Scheraga (Tanaka, S. and Scheraga, H.A. (1976) Macromolecules 9, 168-182) are inferior to those obtained by the other three methods. For the prediction of turns, no significant difference between the methods of Nagano (Nagano, K. (1974) J. Mol. Biol. 84, 337-372) and Argos et al. was found.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)333-338
    Number of pages6
    JournalBBA - Protein Structure
    Volume491
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 28 Mar 1977

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of secondary structure predictions in proteins'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this