Abstract
Embryofetal development (EFD) studies are performed to characterize risk of drugs in pregnant women and on embryofetal development. In line with the ICH S5(R3) guideline, these studies are generally conducted in one rodent and one non-rodent species, commonly rats and rabbits. However, the added value of conducting EFD studies in two species to risk assessment is debatable. In this study, rat and rabbit EFD studies were evaluated to analyze the added value of a second species. Information on rat and rabbit EFD studies conducted for human pharmaceuticals submitted for marketing authorization to the European Medicines Agency between 2004 and 2022 was collected from the database of the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, along with EFD studies conducted for known human teratogens. In total, 369 compounds were included in the database. For 55.6% of the compounds similar effects were observed in rat and rabbit EFD studies. Discordance was observed for 44.6% of compounds. Discordance could often be explained based on occurrence of maternal toxicity or the compound’s mechanism of action. For other compounds, discordance was considered of limited clinical relevance due to high exposure margins or less concerning EFD toxicity. For 6.2%, discordance could not be explained and was considered clinically relevant. Furthermore, for specific therapeutic classes, concordance between rat and rabbit could vary. In conclusion, in many cases the added value of conducting EFD studies in two species is limited. These data could help identify scenarios in which (additional) EFD studies could be waived or create a weight-of-evidence model to determine the need for (additional) EFD studies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 619-633 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Critical Reviews in Toxicology |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 2 Aug 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board (CBG-MEB). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Funding
The authors would like to thank the two reviewers which were selected by the Editor and anonymous to the authors. Their comments were very helpful in revising the paper.DAS:The data that has been used is confidential.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board |
Keywords
- cross-species evaluation
- Developmental toxicity
- embryo-fetal development studies
- non-clinical
- pharmaceutical testing
- retrospective analysis
- risk assessment