Evaluation and use of epidemiological evidence for environmental health risk assessment: WHO guideline document

Michal Krzyanowski, Ross Anderson, Ben Armstrong, Larry Chambers, Aaron Cohen, Lynne Edwards, David Gee, Paul Harrison, Karl Heinz Jöckel, Pierre Jouannet, Matti Kamppinen, Klea Katsouyanni, Manolis Kogevinas, Nino Künzli, Erik Lebret, Rolaf Van Leeuwen, Marco Martuzzi, Robert Maynard, Göran Pershagen, Charles PooleGerhard Raabe, Simon Rozendaal, Bernd Seifert, Jack Spengler, John Vandenberg, Paolo Vineis, Douglas Weed, Bogdan Wojtyniak, Maged Younes, Denis Zmirou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Environmental health risk assessment is increasingly being used in the development of environmental health policies, public health decision making, the establishment of environmental regulations, and research planning. The credibility of risk assessment depends, to a large extent, on the strength of the scientific evidence on which it is based. It is, therefore, imperative that the processes and methods used to evaluate the evidence and estimate health risks are clear, explicit, and based on valid epidemiological theory and practice. Epidemiological Evidence for Environmental Health Risk Assessment is a World Health Organization (WHO) guideline document. The primary target audiences of the guidelines are expert review groups that WHO (or other organizations) might convene in the future to evaluate epidemiological evidence on the health effects of environmental factors. These guidelines identify a set of processes and general approaches to assess available epidemiological information in a clear, consistent, and explicit manner. The guidelines should also help in the evaluation of epidemiological studies with respect to their ability to support risk assessment and; consequently, risk management. Conducting expert reviews according to such explicit guidelines would make health risk assessment and subsequent risk management and risk communication processes more readily understood and likely to be accepted by policymakers and the public. It would also make the conclusions reached by reviews more readily acceptable as a basis for future WHO guidelines and other recommendations, and would provide a more rational basis for setting priorities for future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)997-1002
Number of pages6
JournalEnvironmental Health Perspectives
Volume108
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Environmental health
  • Environmental health risk assessment
  • Guidelines
  • International cooperation
  • World Health Organization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation and use of epidemiological evidence for environmental health risk assessment: WHO guideline document'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this