Evaluating the translational value of preclinical models: Available tools and frameworks, challenges and strategies

  • Francesca Pistollato*
  • , Fabia Furtmann
  • , Marco Straccia
  • , Marc Avey
  • , David Mawufemor Azilagbetor
  • , Celean Camp
  • , Conor Delaney
  • , Guilherme S. Ferreira
  • , Maria Laura Garcia-Bermejo
  • , Annalisa Gastaldello
  • , Kurinchi Gurusamy
  • , Laura Holden
  • , Jonathan Kimmelman
  • , Simon Lohse
  • , Bianca Marigliani
  • , Julia M.L. Menon
  • , Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga
  • , Shaarika Sarasija
  • , Danilo Tagle
  • , Ignacio J. Tripodi
  • Jan Turner, Martin Wehling, Helder Costantino
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Recent global initiatives are accelerating the shift toward human-centric approaches, reducing reliance on animal models in preclinical research and other domains. In this changing landscape, objectively evaluating the scientific relevance and merit of research involving animal models, and assessing their translational relevance is increasingly critical. Over the past decade, several tools have been developed to assess translational relevance, accuracy/appropriateness and efficacy of preclinical animal models, evaluate risk-of-bias in preclinical research, support harm–benefit analyses, and facilitate the adoption of non-animal replacement strategies. However, the uptake of such tools remains limited. To address this, a Biomedical Research for the 21st Century (BioMed21) Collaboration workshop on ‘Evaluating translational value of animal models in preclinical research — Tools, challenges, and strategies’, was convened by Humane World for Animals (30 June–1 July 2025). The event brought together tool developers and diverse global interest-holders to review current assessment tools, discuss their strengths, complementarity, limitations and feasibility, and explore opportunities for cross-sector collaboration. This paper summarises key outcomes of these presentations and discussions, highlighting knowledge gaps and barriers to the adoption of these tools and frameworks by researchers, funders and regulators. Strategies to raise awareness and promote the use of the tools and frameworks, to better inform funding decisions, regulatory approval and the appraisal of preclinical research, are also proposed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10-27
Number of pages18
JournalAlternatives to Laboratory Animals
Volume54
Issue number1
Early online date27 Nov 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

Keywords

  • 3Rs
  • animal models
  • assessment tools
  • NAMs
  • non-animal approaches
  • preclinical research
  • replacement
  • Three Rs
  • translational relevance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the translational value of preclinical models: Available tools and frameworks, challenges and strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this