Abstract
Innovation systems and transitions thinking have become increasingly pervasive in what has been labelled a third generation of challenge-led innovation and transitions policy programmes. Although this upsurge is cause for celebration, we argue that the challenge now lies in developing the evaluation methods that allow for the assessment of strong and weak programmes, to foster a culture of learning and to maintain momentum. Therefore, in this brief review, we take stock of existing approaches and identify 6 tentative categories of evaluations, which we map out on the axis of formative and summative evaluation. Combining summative evaluations with more frequent formative evaluations may create the environment for rapid learning and policy adaptation necessary to prevent the current rise of systemic innovation and transition programmes from being short lived.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e0000008. |
Pages (from-to) | 1-6 |
Journal | PLOS Sustainability and Transformation |
Volume | 1 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | Mar 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2022 |