TY - JOUR
T1 - European collaboration on relative effectiveness assessments
T2 - What is needed to be successful?
AU - Kleijnen, Sarah
AU - Toenders, Wil
AU - de Groot, Folkert
AU - Huic, Mirjana
AU - George, Elisabeth
AU - Wieseler, Beate
AU - Pavlovic, Mira
AU - Bucsics, Anna
AU - Siviero, Paolo D
AU - van der Graaff, Martin
AU - Rdzany, Rafał
AU - Kristensen, Finn Børlum
AU - Goettsch, Wim
N1 - Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to identify the possible barriers and critical success factors for the implementation of European collaboration in the field of relative effectiveness assessment (REA) of drugs.METHODS: Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with representatives from eight European health technology assessment (HTA) organisations involved in assessment of drugs for coverage decision-making (AAZ, AIFA, AHTAPol, HAS, HVB, IQWIG, NICE and ZiN).RESULTS: Potential barriers identified mainly relate to methodology, resources and challenges with implementation in the respective national processes (e.g. legal restrictions). The most critical success factors for production of cross-border assessments were the continuous cooperation of competent partners, and the quality and timely availability of the assessment.CONCLUSION: Further adaptation of the process and methods is required for optimal collaboration. In the near future it can be expected that cross-border assessments will meet in particular the needs of smaller/middle-sized European countries and also European countries with less developed HTA systems as the potential efficiency/quality gains are the highest for these countries. Therefore, national implementation of cross-border assessments is especially likely in these countries in the coming years. Once more experience is gained with cross-border assessments, and successes become more evident, efficiency/quality gains may also be likely for some larger countries with well established processes.
AB - OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to identify the possible barriers and critical success factors for the implementation of European collaboration in the field of relative effectiveness assessment (REA) of drugs.METHODS: Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with representatives from eight European health technology assessment (HTA) organisations involved in assessment of drugs for coverage decision-making (AAZ, AIFA, AHTAPol, HAS, HVB, IQWIG, NICE and ZiN).RESULTS: Potential barriers identified mainly relate to methodology, resources and challenges with implementation in the respective national processes (e.g. legal restrictions). The most critical success factors for production of cross-border assessments were the continuous cooperation of competent partners, and the quality and timely availability of the assessment.CONCLUSION: Further adaptation of the process and methods is required for optimal collaboration. In the near future it can be expected that cross-border assessments will meet in particular the needs of smaller/middle-sized European countries and also European countries with less developed HTA systems as the potential efficiency/quality gains are the highest for these countries. Therefore, national implementation of cross-border assessments is especially likely in these countries in the coming years. Once more experience is gained with cross-border assessments, and successes become more evident, efficiency/quality gains may also be likely for some larger countries with well established processes.
KW - Comparative Effectiveness Research
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Drug Evaluation/methods
KW - Europe
KW - Humans
KW - International Cooperation
KW - Models, Organizational
KW - Pharmaceutical Preparations/standards
KW - Qualitative Research
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.01.018
DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.01.018
M3 - Review article
C2 - 25703539
SN - 0168-8510
VL - 119
SP - 569
EP - 576
JO - Health Policy
JF - Health Policy
IS - 5
ER -