Abstract
Soil phosphorus (P) availability may limit plant growth and alter root-soil interactions and rhizosphere microbial community composition. The composition of the rhizosphere microbial community can also be shaped by plant genotype. In this study, we examined the rhizosphere microbial communities of young plants of 24 species of eucalypts (22 Eucalyptus and two Corymbia species) under low or sufficient soil P availability. The taxonomic diversity of the rhizosphere bacterial and fungal communities was assessed by 16S and 18S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. The taxonomic modifications in response to low P availability were evaluated by principal component analysis, and co-inertia analysis was performed to identify associations between bacterial and fungal community structures and parameters related to plant growth and nutritional status under low and sufficient soil P availability. The sequencing results showed that while both soil P availability and eucalypt species influenced the microbial community assembly, eucalypt species was the stronger determinant. However, when the plants are subjected to low P-availability, the rhizosphere selection became strongest. In response to low P, the bacterial and fungal communities in the rhizosphere of some species showed significant changes, whereas in others remained relatively constant under low and sufficient P. Co-inertia analyses revealed a significant co-dependence between plant nutrient contents and bacterial and fungal community composition only under sufficient P. By contrast, under low P, bacterial community composition was related to plant biomass production. In conclusion, our study shows that eucalypt species identity was the main factor modulating rhizosphere microbial community composition; significant shifts due to P availability were observed only for some eucalypt species.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 155667 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Science of the Total Environment |
Volume | 836 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 25 Aug 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP – Grant number 2016/25498-0 ). Publication number 7420 of the Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW).
Funding Information:
We thank FAPESP and CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brazil) for doctoral and doctorate-sandwich program abroad fellowships to RGB. PM thanks Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for a research fellowship.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP – Grant number 2016/25498-0). Publication number 7420 of the Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
Funding
This work was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP – Grant number 2016/25498-0 ). Publication number 7420 of the Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW). We thank FAPESP and CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brazil) for doctoral and doctorate-sandwich program abroad fellowships to RGB. PM thanks Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for a research fellowship. This work was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP – Grant number 2016/25498-0). Publication number 7420 of the Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW).
Keywords
- 16S rRNA gene
- 18S rRNA gene
- Next-generation sequencing
- Plant species