Abstract
This paper, using literature on the evolution of EU administrative
governance, surveys and explains reactions of national courts to European
Commission-issued soft law in the decentralized competition enforcement
regime. While soft law in competition policy was used since the 1960’s,
decentralization exposed the field to the dynamics of multi-level
governance, which gave a central role to said instruments in securing the
consistent enforcement of the multi-layered regime. This paper empirically
ascertains the workings of European Commission-issued competition soft law
in national courts and shows more is needed to achieve the consistent
enforcement through soft means envisioned by the European Commission.
governance, surveys and explains reactions of national courts to European
Commission-issued soft law in the decentralized competition enforcement
regime. While soft law in competition policy was used since the 1960’s,
decentralization exposed the field to the dynamics of multi-level
governance, which gave a central role to said instruments in securing the
consistent enforcement of the multi-layered regime. This paper empirically
ascertains the workings of European Commission-issued competition soft law
in national courts and shows more is needed to achieve the consistent
enforcement through soft means envisioned by the European Commission.
Original language | Undefined/Unknown |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 56-99 |
Number of pages | 43 |
Journal | Global Antitrust Review |
Issue number | 12 |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2019 |