Estimating the impact of COVID-19 self-test availability and modifications in test-strategy on overall test uptake using an experimental vignette study

Colene L. Zomer*, Floor Kroese, Jet G. Sanders, Riny Janssen, Marijn de Bruin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

To inform future Dutch COVID-19 testing policies we did an experimental vignette study to investigate whether inclusion of the less reliable lateral flow tests (self-tests) would change test-uptake sufficiently to improve population-level test sensitivity. A representative sample (n = 3,270) participated in a 2-by-2 online experiment to evaluate the effects of test-guidelines including self-testing advice (IV1), and the effects of self-test availability (IV2) on expected test uptake (PCR test, self-test or no test) and sensitivity of the overall test strategy (primary outcome). Across four scenarios, changing test advice did not affect expected testing behaviour. Self-test availability, however, increased the timeliness of testing, the number of people testing, and overall test strategy sensitivity. Based on these findings, we recommend that (national) policy facilitates a supply of self-tests at home, for example through free and pro-active distribution of test-kits during a pandemic. This could substantially enhance the chances of timely detecting and isolating patients.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5887
Number of pages9
JournalScientific Reports
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Mar 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Funding

This study is funded by the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment of the Netherlands.

FundersFunder number
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment of the Netherlands

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating the impact of COVID-19 self-test availability and modifications in test-strategy on overall test uptake using an experimental vignette study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this