Estimating stochastic survey response errors using the multitrait‐multierror model

Alexandru Cernat, Daniel L. Oberski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Surveys are well known to contain response errors of different types, including acquiescence, social desirability, common method variance and random error simultaneously. Nevertheless, a single error source at a time is all that most methods developed to estimate and correct for such errors consider in practice. Consequently, estimation of response errors is inefficient, their relative importance is unknown and the optimal question format may not be discoverable. To remedy this situation, we demonstrate how multiple types of errors can be estimated concurrently with the recently introduced ‘multitrait-multierror’ (MTME) approach. MTME combines the theory of design of experiments with latent variable modelling to estimate response error variances of different error types simultaneously. This allows researchers to evaluate which errors are most impactful, and aids in the discovery of optimal question formats. We apply this approach using representative data from the United Kingdom to six survey items measuring attitudes towards immigrants that are commonly used across public opinion studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)134-155
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society
Volume185
Issue number1
Early online date12 Oct 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2022

Keywords

  • attitudes towards immigrants
  • design of experiments (DoE)
  • latent variable modelling
  • measurement error
  • multitrait

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating stochastic survey response errors using the multitrait‐multierror model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this