Essential work and emergency childcare. Identifying gender differences in COVID-19 effects on labour demand and supply

Jordy Meekes*, Wolter Hassink, Guyonne Kalb

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We examine whether the COVID-19 crisis affects women and men differently in terms of employment, working hours, and hourly wages, and whether the effects are demand or supply driven. COVID-19 impacts are studied using administrative data on all Dutch employees up to December 2020, focussing on the national lockdowns and emergency childcare for essential workers in the Netherlands. First, the impact of COVID-19 is much larger for non-essential workers than for essential workers. Although female non-essential workers are more affected than male non-essential workers, on average, women and men are equally affected, because more women than men are essential workers. Second, the impact for partnered essential workers with young children, both men and women, is not larger than for others. Third, single-parent essential workers respond with relatively large reductions in labour supply, suggesting emergency childcare was insufficient for them. Overall, labour demand effects appear larger than labour supply effects.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbergpac030
Pages (from-to)393–417
Number of pages25
JournalOxford Economic Papers
Volume75
Issue number2
Early online date19 Jul 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2023

Keywords

  • J13 - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
  • J16 - Economics of Gender
  • Non-labor DiscriminationJ20 - GeneralJ64 - Unemployment: Models
  • J20 - General
  • J64 - Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Essential work and emergency childcare. Identifying gender differences in COVID-19 effects on labour demand and supply'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this