ERS technical standard: Global Lung Function Initiative reference values for exhaled nitric oxide fraction (FENO50)

  • Global Lung Function Initiative FENO Task Force
  • , Marieann Högman
  • , Cole Bowerman
  • , Luis Chavez
  • , Holger Dressel
  • , Andrei Malinovschi
  • , Thomas Radtke
  • , Sanja Stanojevic
  • , Irene Steenbruggen
  • , Steve Turner
  • , Anh Tuan Dinh-Xuan*
  • , Rital Amaral
  • , Vibeke Backer
  • , Paolo Cameli
  • , Sy Duong-Quy
  • , Ting Fan Leung
  • , Ulrike Gehring
  • , Graham Hall
  • , Soo Jong Hong
  • , Thong Hua-Huy
  • Tiago Jacinto, Mohamed Jeebhay, Carla Martins, Charles McSharry, Anna Carin Olin, Mario Olivieri, Domingo Pérez Bejarano, Romy Rodriguez, Lidwien A.M. Smit, Woo Jung Song, Denis Vinnikov
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background Elevated exhaled nitric oxide fraction at a flow rate of 50 mL·s−1 (FENO50) is an important indicator of T-helper 2-driven airway inflammation and may aid clinicians in the diagnosis and monitoring of asthma. This study aimed to derive Global Lung Function Initiative reference equations and the upper limit of normal for FENO50. Methods Available individual FENO50 data were collated and harmonised using consensus-derived variables and definitions. Data collected from individuals who met the harmonised definition of “healthy” were analysed using the generalised additive models of location, scale and shape (GAMLSS) technique. Results Data were retrospectively collated from 34 782 individuals from 34 sites in 15 countries, of whom 8022 met the definition of healthy (19 sites, 11 countries). Overall, height, age and sex only explained 12% of the between-subject variability of FENO50 (R2=0.12). FENO device was neccessary as a predictor of FENO50, such that the healthy range of values and the upper limit of normal varied depending on which device was used. The range of FENO50 values observed in healthy individuals was also very wide, and the heterogeneity was partially explained by the device used. When analysing a subset of data in which FENO50 was measured using the same device and a stricter definition of health (n=1027), between-site heterogeneity remained. Conclusion Available FENO50 data collected from different sites using different protocols and devices were too variable to develop a single all-age reference equation. Further standardisation of FENO devices and measurement are required before population reference values might be derived.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2300370
JournalEuropean Respiratory Journal
Volume63
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © The authors 2024.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ERS technical standard: Global Lung Function Initiative reference values for exhaled nitric oxide fraction (FENO50)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this