Abstract
Equation (7) of the published article (Aasi et al. 2015) is in error; it should read (Equation presented). The upper limits on ò presented in the published article are unaffected by this error. Equation (8) of the published article is in error; it should read (Equation presented) The upper limits on α presented in Figure 3 and Table 4 of the published article were computed incorrectly. The revised Figure 3 (bottom) shows the corrected upper limits on α for the G266.2-1.2 (Vela Jr.) wide search. The revised Table 4 is provided here. The correct lowest upper limit on α (quoted in the Abstract of the published article) is 3 × 10-6. Figure 4 shows the incorrect and corrected upper limits on α for the G266.2-1.2 (Vela Jr.) wide search, which have been surpassed by upper limits from Abbott et al. (2019).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 90 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-5 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Astrophysical Journal |
| Volume | 918 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 10 Sept 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Searches for continuous gravitational waves from nine young supernova remnants (ApJ (2015) 813 (39) DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/39)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver