Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China's cement industry: A perspective from LMDI decomposition analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We analyze the change of energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China's cement industry and its driving factors over the period 1990–2009 by applying a log-mean Divisia index (LMDI) method. It is based on the typical production process for clinker manufacturing and differentiates among four determining factors: cement output, clinker share, process structure and specific energy consumption per kiln type. The results show that the growth of cement output is the most important factor driving energy consumption up, while clinker share decline, structural shifts mainly drive energy consumption down (similar for CO2 emissions). These efficiency improvements result from a number of policies which are transforming the entire cement industry towards international best practice including shutting down many older plants and raising the efficiency standards of cement plants. Still, the efficiency gains cannot compensate for the huge increase in cement production resulting from economic growth particularly in the infrastructure and construction sectors. Finally, scenario analysis shows that applying best available technology would result in an additional energy saving potential of 26% and a CO2 mitigation potential of 33% compared to 2009.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)821-832
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume50
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

Keywords

  • Chinese cement industry
  • Energy efficiency
  • CO2 emission

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China's cement industry: A perspective from LMDI decomposition analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this