Abstract
Recently, there has been (and still is) a lot of discussion about the replicability of scientific findings. Hornikx and Batenburg (2016) try to explain the non-replicability in science, and discuss the situation for language research. We make the point that empirically sound conclusions will contribute to the replicability of science. In this commentary, we discuss several practices that will help the empirical language researcher to draw more solid conclusions from their data.
| Translated title of the contribution | Empirically sound conclusions: A guide for language researchers |
|---|---|
| Original language | Dutch |
| Pages (from-to) | 139-146 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- replicability
- experimental design