TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of Vocabulary and Phonotactic Probability on 2-Year-Olds’ Nonword Repetition
AU - Verhagen, Josje
AU - de Bree, Elise
AU - Mulder, Hanna
AU - Leseman, Paul
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - This study investigates the relationship between nonword repetition (NWR) and vocabulary in 2-year-olds. Questions addressed are whether (1) NWR and vocabulary are associated, (2) phonotactic probability affects NWR, and (3) there is an interaction effect between phonotactic probability and vocabulary on NWR performance. The general aim of the study is to investigate whether NWR, as a task of phonological storage, assesses the quality of phonological representations in children as young as 2 years of age. 557 Dutch 2-year-olds performed a NWR task containing items of varying phonotactic probability as well as a receptive vocabulary task. The results showed a moderate, significant correlation between NWR and vocabulary. Phonotactic probability had an effect on NWR performance. Further analyses showed that there was a significant interaction between phonotactic probability and vocabulary for part of the items. These results support previously reported effects of vocabulary and phonotactic probability on NWR in older, English-speaking children for a large sample of Dutch-speaking 2-year-olds, and provide evidence that NWR assesses the quality of phonological representations already in very young children.
AB - This study investigates the relationship between nonword repetition (NWR) and vocabulary in 2-year-olds. Questions addressed are whether (1) NWR and vocabulary are associated, (2) phonotactic probability affects NWR, and (3) there is an interaction effect between phonotactic probability and vocabulary on NWR performance. The general aim of the study is to investigate whether NWR, as a task of phonological storage, assesses the quality of phonological representations in children as young as 2 years of age. 557 Dutch 2-year-olds performed a NWR task containing items of varying phonotactic probability as well as a receptive vocabulary task. The results showed a moderate, significant correlation between NWR and vocabulary. Phonotactic probability had an effect on NWR performance. Further analyses showed that there was a significant interaction between phonotactic probability and vocabulary for part of the items. These results support previously reported effects of vocabulary and phonotactic probability on NWR in older, English-speaking children for a large sample of Dutch-speaking 2-year-olds, and provide evidence that NWR assesses the quality of phonological representations already in very young children.
KW - 2-Year-olds
KW - Nonword repetition
KW - Phonological representations
KW - Phonotactic probability
KW - Vocabulary
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986325285&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10936-016-9448-9
DO - 10.1007/s10936-016-9448-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84986325285
SN - 0090-6905
VL - 46
SP - 507
EP - 524
JO - Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
JF - Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
IS - 3
ER -