Effects of the analytical treatment of exposure data on associations of cancer and occupational magnetic field exposure

Dana Loomis, Hans Kromhout, Robert C. Kleckner, David A. Savitz

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Epidemiological studies of cancer among workers exposed to magnetic fields have yielded inconsistent results. This variability may be partly explained by differences in study methods. To assess sensitivity to such methods, data from a previous study of brain cancer and leukemia among electric power company workers were reanalyzed using alternative models, which incorporated uncertainty about the intensity of historical exposures, alternative cut points for categorizing the exposure variable for analysis, and a range of lags for describing cancer latency. Mortality rate ratios for leukemia ranged from 0.8-1.5. For brain cancer, increasing cumulative magnetic field exposure was associated with increasing mortality in virtually all models, with rate ratios between 1.3-3.4 for the most exposed workers. These rate ratios are consistent with previous analyses suggesting a 1.5- 3.0-fold increase in the risk of brain cancer but no association with leukemia, and confirm that the previous results are not dependent on arbitrary decisions in applying the exposure data.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)49-56
    Number of pages8
    JournalAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine
    Volume34
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 1998

    Keywords

    • Electromagnetic fields
    • Epidemiologic methods
    • Exposure assessment
    • article
    • brain cancer
    • cancer incidence
    • electromagnetism
    • human
    • leukemia
    • major clinical study
    • mortality
    • occupational carcinogenesis
    • occupational exposure
    • risk assessment
    • risk factor
    • statistical analysis

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of the analytical treatment of exposure data on associations of cancer and occupational magnetic field exposure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this