Effects of porosity and water saturation on the effective diffusivity of a cathode catalyst layer

H. Fathi, A. Raoof, S.H. Mansouri, M.Th. van Genuchten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The performance of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell, PEMFC, is significantly affected by the rate of oxygen diffusion through the cathode catalyst layer, CCL. Continuum-scale modelling of PEMFCs requires knowledge of the effective oxygen diffusivity as a function of CCL porosity and its water saturation. To provide this functionality, we used three-dimensional pore-scale modelling to simulate the diffusion of oxygen under different liquid water saturations in CCLs having different porosity values. Solving the governing equations for immiscible two-phase flow, fluid distributions at different saturation levels were obtained. We show that the presence of liquid water initiates a hindering effect by decreasing the diffusive transport of oxygen. Oxygen diffusion, including dissolution of oxygen into the liquid water phase, was taken into account to calculate effective diffusivity values of the entire domain. The resulting effective diffusivity values showed good agreement with values reported in the literature, which are often based on quasi-empirical relationships. Utilizing a large number of simulation results, a correlation equation was developed for the effective diffusivity of oxygen as a function of porosity and liquid water saturation, which is appropriate to be used for macroscopic modelling of flow and transport in CCLs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)F298-F305
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the Electrochemical Society
Volume164
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • catalyst layer
  • effective diffusivity
  • two-phase flow
  • pore scale modelling
  • PEM fuel cell

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of porosity and water saturation on the effective diffusivity of a cathode catalyst layer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this