Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effects of bioturbation on the erodibility of cohesive versus non-cohesive sediments along a current-velocity gradient: A case study on cockles

  • Baoquan Li
  • , Francesco Cozzoli
  • , Laura M. Soissons
  • , Tjeerd J. Bouma*
  • , Linlin Chen
  • *Corresponding author for this work
    • CAS - Yantai Institute of Coastal Research for Sustainable Development

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Soft-bottom bioturbators are ecosystem engineers in the sense that they can have considerable effects on sediment erodibility and resuspension. The common cockle Cerastoderma edule is a bioturbating filter feeder that is widespread along the European Atlantic coastline. Its presence and activity can decrease sediment erosion thresholds in cohesive sediments but little is known about its effect on non-cohesive sediments. Using controlled annular flume experiments, we investigated the relative effects of different cockle densities on sediment resuspension in cohesive vs. non-cohesive sediments by assessing the following: (i) the mud and sand burrowing behavior of cockles, (ii) critical erosion thresholds, (iii) the mass of eroded sediment and (iv) erosion rates. Our results show that cockles were more active in non-cohesive sediment compared with cohesive sediment. Despite their lower activity, the presence of cockles in cohesive sediment increased sediment erodibility by reducing the critical erosion threshold (Ucrit) and increasing both the mass of eroded sediment and erosion rate. In contrast, cockles had no effect on erodibility in non-cohesive sediment, especially on the eroded sediment mass and erosion rate. The mass eroded was not significantly different between cohesive and non-cohesive sediments when cockles were present. Our experiments show that the increased erodibility of cohesive sediment due to the bioturbation by cockles is density dependent: higher cockle density results in stronger effects on erodibility. Moreover, this increase in cohesive sediment erosion due to cockle bioturbation was positively correlated with current velocity. In contrast, the erosion of non-cohesive sediment only depended on the current stress and was unaffected by cockle density. Considering the high abundance of C. edule, its widespread distribution and its extensive activities, the results of this study could be widely applicable to intertidal mud flats around the world.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)84-90
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
    Volume496
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

    Funding

    This work was conducted as part of the NSFC-NWO “Water ways, Harbours, Estuaries and Coastal Engineering” scheme and was co-supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. NSFC41061130543 ) and the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (No. 843.10.003 ), the Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences , Grant No. KZZD-EW-14 , the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences , Grant Nos. XDA11020403 & XDA1102702 , and the Centre of Expertise project Oesterdam .

    Keywords

    • Bioturbation
    • Cerastoderma edule
    • Cockle
    • Erosion rates
    • Erosion threshold
    • Sediment erosion

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of bioturbation on the erodibility of cohesive versus non-cohesive sediments along a current-velocity gradient: A case study on cockles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this