TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of eye movement modeling examples in problem solving
T2 - The role of verbal ambiguity and prior knowledge
AU - van Marlen, Tim
AU - van Wermeskerken, Margot
AU - Jarodzka, Halszka
AU - van Gog, Tamara
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - Eye movement modeling examples (EMME) are video modeling examples with the model's eye movements superimposed. Thus far, EMME on problem-solving tasks seem to be effective for guiding students’ attention, but this does not translate into higher learning outcomes. We therefore investigated the role of ambiguity of the verbal explanation and prior knowledge in the effectiveness of EMME on geometry problems. In Experiment 1, 57 university students observed EMME or regular video modeling examples (ME) with ambiguous verbal explanations. Eye-tracking data revealed that –as in prior research with unambiguous explanations- EMME successfully guided students’ attention but did not improve test performance, possibly due to students’ high prior knowledge. Therefore, Experiment 2, was conducted with 108 secondary education students who had less prior knowledge, using a 2 (EMME/ME) x 2 (ambiguous/unambiguous explanations) between-subjects design. Verbal ambiguity did not affect learning, but students in the EMME conditions outperformed those in the ME conditions.
AB - Eye movement modeling examples (EMME) are video modeling examples with the model's eye movements superimposed. Thus far, EMME on problem-solving tasks seem to be effective for guiding students’ attention, but this does not translate into higher learning outcomes. We therefore investigated the role of ambiguity of the verbal explanation and prior knowledge in the effectiveness of EMME on geometry problems. In Experiment 1, 57 university students observed EMME or regular video modeling examples (ME) with ambiguous verbal explanations. Eye-tracking data revealed that –as in prior research with unambiguous explanations- EMME successfully guided students’ attention but did not improve test performance, possibly due to students’ high prior knowledge. Therefore, Experiment 2, was conducted with 108 secondary education students who had less prior knowledge, using a 2 (EMME/ME) x 2 (ambiguous/unambiguous explanations) between-subjects design. Verbal ambiguity did not affect learning, but students in the EMME conditions outperformed those in the ME conditions.
KW - Attention cueing
KW - Example-based learning
KW - Eye movement modeling examples
KW - Eye tracking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051403120&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.005
DO - 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85051403120
SN - 0959-4752
VL - 58
SP - 274
EP - 283
JO - Learning and Instruction
JF - Learning and Instruction
ER -