Effect of Lavage Solution Type on Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Cytology in Clinically Healthy Horses

Cornélie Westermann*, Annelieke de Bie, Carla Olave, Janny de Grauw, Erik Teske, Laurent Couétil

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Equine bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is usually performed with 250–500 mL of isotonic saline at pH 5.5. The acidic pH of saline may cause an increase in airway neutrophil count 48 h after BAL. Other isotonic solutions such as Ringer’s solution, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or Plasma-Lyte 148® have a neutral pH of 7.4 and might be a better choice for BAL by not provoking inflammation and the influx of neutrophils into airways. BAL was performed in four healthy horses in four different lung lobes using four different solutions in a randomized crossover design. In each lobe, BAL was performed twice with a 48 h interval using 250 mL of solution. Automated total nucleated cell counts (TNCs) were recorded, and differential cell counts in lavage fluid were determined by two investigators blinded to treatments. The mean volume of BAL fluid retrieved was 51 ± 14%. The mean neutrophil percentage (%N) increased from 1.5 ± 0.9% to 14.7 ± 9.6% at 48 h (p < 0.001) but was not significantly affected by the solution used or the lung lobe sampled. In conclusion, in this study, the influx of neutrophils into airways after BAL was independent of the type of isotonic solution used and the lung lobe sampled. Saline remains an appropriate solution for BAL in horses.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2637
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalAnimals
Volume13
Issue number16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Aug 2023

Keywords

  • lung lobes
  • equine
  • saline
  • phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
  • Ringer’s
  • Plasma-Lyte

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of Lavage Solution Type on Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Cytology in Clinically Healthy Horses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this