Een 'ernstig kwaad' of een 'geoorloofde daad'? Het taboe op zelfmoord rond 1900

Translated title of the contribution: Suicide in the Netherlands around 1900: a contested taboo
  • Ben de Pater

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterProfessional

    Abstract

    The increasing number of suicides in 'civilised' Europe during the last decades of the nineteenth century attracted the attention on many precarious social scientists: Masaryk, Morselli, Durkheim. It was a hot issue in the Netherlands as well. Was suicide permitted? Has the individual the right to commit suicide? Always? Never? Did mitigating circumstances exist? Was one allowed to speak about suicide, or was silence the norm? The chapter analyses the opinions of socialists, liberals, Roman-Catholics and (orthodox) Portestants in response to a case-study: the suicide of the feminist-socialist author Cornélie Huygens in 1902. For Christians suicide was a taboo, an immoral act. In the more secularized 'pillars'of liberalism and socialism suicide was more or less accepted - the individual was the master of his/her own life.
    Translated title of the contributionSuicide in the Netherlands around 1900: a contested taboo
    Original languageDutch
    Title of host publicationOnnoemelijke dingen
    Subtitle of host publicationOver taboe en verbod in het fin de siècle
    EditorsAnne van Buul, Ben de Pater, Tom Sintobin, Hans Vandevoorde
    Place of PublicationHilversum
    PublisherUitgeverij Verloren
    Pages113-127
    Number of pages14
    VolumeRythmus. Jaarboek voor de studie van het fin de siècle
    Edition3
    ISBN (Print)978 90 8704 474 9
    Publication statusPublished - 30 Sept 2014

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Suicide in the Netherlands around 1900: a contested taboo: Het taboe op zelfmoord rond 1900'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this