Educational pearl: The risks and benefits of teaching purely functional programming in first year

Manuel M.T. Chakravarty, Gabriele Keller

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

We argue that teaching purely functional programming as such in freshman courses is detrimental to both the curriculum as well as to promoting the paradigm. Instead, we need to focus on the more general aims of teaching elementary techniques of programming and essential concepts of computing. We support this viewpoint with experience gained during several semesters of teaching large first-year classes (up to 600 students) in Haskell. These classes consisted of computer science students as well as students from other disciplines. We have systematically gathered student feedback by conducting surveys after each semester. This article contributes an approach to the use of modern functional languages in first year courses and, based on this, advocates the use of functional languages in this setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-123
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Functional Programming
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Educational pearl: The risks and benefits of teaching purely functional programming in first year'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this