Editorial: Special issue: Nature-based solutions for reducing disaster risk. What is the evidence?

Karen Sudmeier-Rieux*, Stephen Galvin, Udo Michael Nehren, Christine Moos, Marta Vicarelli, Yvonne Walz, Lucy Emerton, Annisa Triyanti, Nathalie Doswald

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Nearly two decades ago, the Indian Ocean tsunami created a devastating human tragedy, leaving many questions in its wake as to the role that mangroves may have played in saving lives and livelihoods. Over the following decade, these questions led to the creation of a new field of study: the role of ecosystems in disaster risk reduction, or Eco-DRR. After 2020, Eco-DRR became quasi-synonymous with ‘Nature-based Solutions for disaster risk reduction’, with a few notable differences. What changed as a result of the Indian Ocean tsunami was an increased awareness that ecosystems could - and should - be part of discourse and portfolios of investments in disaster risk reduction (DRR). Over the next two decades, this awareness grew in three phases: 1) 2005–2014: the ‘convincing stage’; 2) 2015–2020: the ‘mainstreaming stage’ 3) 2020: ‘the blue-printing stage’.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100207
Number of pages4
JournalNature-Based Solutions
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)

Keywords

  • Disaster risk reduction
  • Ecosystem approaches
  • Methodological advances
  • Nature-based solutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Editorial: Special issue: Nature-based solutions for reducing disaster risk. What is the evidence?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this