Editorial Perspective: How should child psychologists and psychiatrists interpret FDA device approval? Caveat emptor

Martijn Arns; Sandra K. Loo; M. Barry Sterman; Hartmut Heinrich; Jonna Kuntsi; Philip Asherson; Tobias Banaschewski; Daniel Brandeis

doi:10.1111/jcpp.12524

Editorial Perspective: How should child psychologists and psychiatrists interpret FDA device approval? Caveat emptor

Martijn Arns^*, Sandra K. Loo, M. Barry Sterman, Hartmut Heinrich, Jonna Kuntsi, Philip Asherson, Tobias Banaschewski, Daniel Brandeis

^*Corresponding author for this work

kbo-Heckscher-Klinikum
neuroCare Group, Munich, Germany
Research Institute Brainclinics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Department of Child & Adolescent Mental Health, University Hospital of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Center for Integrative Human Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	656-658
Number of pages	3
Journal	Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines
Volume	57
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12524
Publication status	Published - 1 May 2016

Keywords

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
diagnostic test
electroencephalogram
Electroencephalogram-Based Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Assessment Aid
Federal Drug Administration
theta-to-beta ratio

Access to Document

10.1111/jcpp.12524

Cite this

@article{a74b3a4373ac443882cf0ad30e0054b5,

title = "Editorial Perspective: How should child psychologists and psychiatrists interpret FDA device approval? Caveat emptor",

keywords = "Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, diagnostic test, electroencephalogram, Electroencephalogram-Based Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Assessment Aid, Federal Drug Administration, theta-to-beta ratio",

author = "Martijn Arns and Loo, {Sandra K.} and Sterman, {M. Barry} and Hartmut Heinrich and Jonna Kuntsi and Philip Asherson and Tobias Banaschewski and Daniel Brandeis",

year = "2016",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/jcpp.12524",

language = "English",

volume = "57",

pages = "656--658",

journal = "Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines",

issn = "0021-9630",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Editorial Perspective

T2 - How should child psychologists and psychiatrists interpret FDA device approval? Caveat emptor

AU - Arns, Martijn

AU - Loo, Sandra K.

AU - Sterman, M. Barry

AU - Heinrich, Hartmut

AU - Kuntsi, Jonna

AU - Asherson, Philip

AU - Banaschewski, Tobias

AU - Brandeis, Daniel

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

KW - Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

KW - diagnostic test

KW - electroencephalogram

KW - Electroencephalogram-Based Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Assessment Aid

KW - Federal Drug Administration

KW - theta-to-beta ratio

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963813556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jcpp.12524

DO - 10.1111/jcpp.12524

M3 - Review article

C2 - 27090383

AN - SCOPUS:84963813556

SN - 0021-9630

VL - 57

SP - 656

EP - 658

JO - Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines

JF - Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines

IS - 5

ER -