Abstract
The Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) represent the world's first effort toward the Paris Agreement goal of keeping global temperature increase well below 2 °C and pursuing 1.5 °C. Little is known about how much the proposed mitigation efforts can reduce the risks and economic damages from unabated climate change and about the consequences if key emitters drop the Paris Agreement. Here, we use CLIMRISK, an integrated assessment model designed to support climate policy at the global, national, and subnational scales where mitigation and adaptation policy decisions are made. We characterize the consequences of unabated climate change and the benefits of current climate policy proposals by means of probabilistic estimates of the economic damages of climate change and uni- and multivariate dynamic climate risk indices at a detailed spatial resolution. The results presented reveal that the economic costs and risks are highly unequally distributed between and within countries and larger than previously estimated when warming in urban areas and temporal persistence of impacts are accounted for. Costs and risks can be significantly limited by strict implementation of NDCs, but increase noticeably under noncompliance by large emitters, like the United States.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 95-115 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences |
| Volume | 1504 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 25 Jun 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:F.E. and W.J.W.B. designed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. These authors contributed equally to the study. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. The authors acknowledge the financial support from the United Nations Development Programme (México), the National Institute of Ecology and Climate Change (Grant IC-2017-068), as part of Mexico’s Sixth National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, and UNAM-DGAPA Grant IN110718, and funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the COACCH project with grant agreement No. 776479. The authors thank Óscar Calderón-Bustamante for his help in developing the computer codes.
Funding Information:
F.E. and W.J.W.B. designed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. These authors contributed equally to the study. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. The authors acknowledge the financial support from the United Nations Development Programme (M?xico), the National Institute of Ecology and Climate Change (Grant IC-2017-068), as part of Mexico's Sixth National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, and UNAM-DGAPA Grant IN110718, and funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the COACCH project with grant agreement No. 776479. The authors thank ?scar Calder?n-Bustamante for his help in developing the computer codes.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of New York Academy of Sciences
Keywords
- climate change
- economic impacts
- integrated assessment model
- risk