TY - JOUR
T1 - Don't fear ‘fear conditioning’
T2 - Methodological considerations for the design and analysis of studies on human fear acquisition, extinction, and return of fear
AU - Lonsdorf, Tina B.
AU - Menz, Mareike M.
AU - Andreatta, Marta
AU - Fullana, Miguel A.
AU - Golkar, Armita
AU - Haaker, Jan
AU - Heitland, Ivo
AU - Hermann, Andrea
AU - Kuhn, Manuel
AU - Kruse, Onno
AU - Meir Drexler, Shira
AU - Meulders, Ann
AU - Nees, Frauke
AU - Pittig, Andre
AU - Richter, Jan
AU - Römer, Sonja
AU - Shiban, Youssef
AU - Schmitz, Anja
AU - Straube, Benjamin
AU - Vervliet, Bram
AU - Wendt, Julia
AU - Baas, Johanna M.P.
AU - Merz, Christian J.
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - The so-called ‘replicability crisis’ has sparked methodological discussions in many areas of science in general, and in psychology in particular. This has led to recent endeavours to promote the transparency, rigour, and ultimately, replicability of research. Originating from this zeitgeist, the challenge to discuss critical issues on terminology, design, methods, and analysis considerations in fear conditioning research is taken up by this work, which involved representatives from fourteen of the major human fear conditioning laboratories in Europe. This compendium is intended to provide a basis for the development of a common procedural and terminology framework for the field of human fear conditioning. Whenever possible, we give general recommendations. When this is not feasible, we provide evidence-based guidance for methodological decisions on study design, outcome measures, and analyses. Importantly, this work is also intended to raise awareness and initiate discussions on crucial questions with respect to data collection, processing, statistical analyses, the impact of subtle procedural changes, and data reporting specifically tailored to the research on fear conditioning.
AB - The so-called ‘replicability crisis’ has sparked methodological discussions in many areas of science in general, and in psychology in particular. This has led to recent endeavours to promote the transparency, rigour, and ultimately, replicability of research. Originating from this zeitgeist, the challenge to discuss critical issues on terminology, design, methods, and analysis considerations in fear conditioning research is taken up by this work, which involved representatives from fourteen of the major human fear conditioning laboratories in Europe. This compendium is intended to provide a basis for the development of a common procedural and terminology framework for the field of human fear conditioning. Whenever possible, we give general recommendations. When this is not feasible, we provide evidence-based guidance for methodological decisions on study design, outcome measures, and analyses. Importantly, this work is also intended to raise awareness and initiate discussions on crucial questions with respect to data collection, processing, statistical analyses, the impact of subtle procedural changes, and data reporting specifically tailored to the research on fear conditioning.
KW - Conditioning
KW - Design
KW - Extinction
KW - Individual differences
KW - Methods
KW - Replicability crisis
KW - Return of fear
KW - Statistics
KW - Terminology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018307996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.026
DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.026
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28263758
AN - SCOPUS:85018307996
SN - 0149-7634
VL - 77
SP - 247
EP - 285
JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
ER -