Doing global urban studies: On the need for engaged pluralism, frame switching, and methodological cross-fertilization

M. van Meeteren, D. Bassens, B. Derudder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

Abstract

By way of rejoinder to commentaries by members of the invisible college of postcolonial urbanism, we further develop issues of praxis regarding engaged pluralism and plead for its usefulness. Engaged pluralism when doing global urban studies depends on a research culture where both deconstructive and reconstructive moments are encouraged. Deconstruction benefits from the provincialization of all knowledge. Reconstruction can occur when we bracket ontological and epistemological incommensurability and focus on the cognitively enriching research praxis of frame switching, where research perspectives constitute nonexclusive, temporary, or alternating entries for research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)296-301
JournalDialogues in Human Geography
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Doing global urban studies: On the need for engaged pluralism, frame switching, and methodological cross-fertilization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this