Does Stereotype Threat Contribute to the Political Knowledge Gender Gap? A Preregistered Replication Study of Ihme and Tausendpfund (2018)

Flavio Azevedo, Leticia Micheli, Deliah Sarah Bolesta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The gender gap in political knowledge is a well-established finding in Political Science. One explanation for gender differences in political knowledge is the activation of negative stereotypes about women. As part of the Systematizing Confidence in Open Research and Evidence (SCORE) program, we conducted a two-stage preregistered and high-powered direct replication of Study 2 of Ihme and Tausendpfund (2018). While we successfully replicated the gender gap in political knowledge – such that male participants performed better than female participants – both the first (N = 671) and second stage (N = 831) of the replication of the stereotype activation effect were unsuccessful. Taken together (pooled N = 1,502), results indicate evidence of absence of the effect of stereotype activation on gender differences in political knowledge. We discuss potential explanations for these findings and put forward evidence that the gender gap in political knowledge might be an artifact of how knowledge is measured.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)102-113
JournalJournal of Experimental Political Science
Volume11
Issue number1
Early online date16 Mar 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Stereotype threat
  • gender gap
  • open data
  • political behavior
  • political knowledge
  • preregistered direct replication
  • replication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does Stereotype Threat Contribute to the Political Knowledge Gender Gap? A Preregistered Replication Study of Ihme and Tausendpfund (2018)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this