Does retrieval practice depend on semantic cues? Assessing the fuzzy trace account of the testing effect

  • Gerdien G. van Eersel
  • , Peter P.J.L. Verkoeijen
  • , Samantha Bouwmeester
  • , Huib K. Tabbers
  • , Remy M.J.P. Rikers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Retrieval practice enhances long-term retention more than restudying; a phenomenon called the testing effect. The fuzzy trace explanation predicts that a testing effect will already emerge after a short interval when participants are solely provided with semantic cues in the final test. In the present study, we assessed this explanation by gradually reducing the surface features overlap between cues in the learning phase and the final recognition test. In all five experiments, participants in the control/word condition received as final test cues the same words as in the learning phase. The experimental final test cues consisted of scrambled words, words in a new context, scrambled words in a new context (Experiment 1), synonyms (Experiment 2), or images (Experiments 3, 4a, 4b). A short-term testing effect was only observed for the image final test cues. These results do not provide strong support for the fuzzy trace explanation of the testing effect.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)583-598
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Cognitive Psychology
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jul 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Testing effect
  • fuzzy trace theory
  • recognition memory
  • retrieval practice
  • semantic processing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does retrieval practice depend on semantic cues? Assessing the fuzzy trace account of the testing effect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this