Does Democratic Innovation Reduce Bias? The G1000 as a New Form of Local Citizen Participation

H.A. Binnema, A.M.B. Michels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Since less well educated citizens are underrepresented in many forms of citizen participation, deliberative ‘mini-publics’ have been introduced as a democratic innovation to redress some of this inequality. Using data from eleven Dutch deliberative mini-publics (G1000s), this study shows that despite attempts to broaden the appeal of the mini-public, a clear educational bias in the
output of the deliberations remains; the output largely reflects the wishes and preferences of the more highly educated. Themes like crime and safety, immigration and integration, which are important concerns for many citizens in their local communities, rarely made it onto the G1000 ‘Agenda for the City’. From a perspective of democratic legitimacy, this finding is worrisome. The
paper concludes with some suggestions that combine the strength of a deliberative setting with equality and external democratic legitimacy to overcome this problem.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)475-485
JournalInternational Journal of Public Administration
Volume45
Issue number6
Early online date2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Keywords

  • Innovation
  • citizen participation
  • deliberative democracy
  • inequality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does Democratic Innovation Reduce Bias? The G1000 as a New Form of Local Citizen Participation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this