Do You Think This is a Game? Contrasting a Serious Game with a Gamified Application for Health

Johannes Pfau, Jan David Smeddinck, Georg Volkmar, Nina Wenig, Rainer Malaka

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The general promise of employing the motivational power of games for serious purposes, such as performing physiotherapy exercises, is well-established. However, game user research discusses both the approach of gamification, i.e. adding game-elements on to a task-focused application and of serious games, i.e. injecting task-focused elements into a more fully-fledged game. There is a surprising lack of empirical work that contrasts both approaches. We present both a casually gamified application and a serious game with purpose-driven mechanics that provide different frontends to the same underlying digital health application. This application aims at supporting physiotherapy sessions for chronic lower-back afflictions. Results from an explorative pre-study contrasting both approaches indicate a clear preference for the serious game version, capturing higher perceived motivational components (autonomy and relatedness), as well as higher immersion and flow relative to the gamified version.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationExtended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Pages1-6
Number of pages6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do You Think This is a Game? Contrasting a Serious Game with a Gamified Application for Health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this