Do we Always Act on Maxims?

Sven Nyholm

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    It is commonly thought that on Kant's view of action, 'everyone always acts on maxims'. Call this the 'descriptive reading'. This reading faces two important problems. First, the idea that people always act on maxims offends against common sense: it clashes with our ordinary ideas about human agency. Second, there are various passages in which Kant says that it is 'rare' and 'admirable' to firmly adhere to a set of basic principles that we adopt for ourselves. This article offers an alternative: the 'normative reading'. On this reading, it is a normative ideal to adopt and act on maxims: it is one of the things we would do if our reason were fully in control of our decision-making.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)233-255
    Number of pages23
    JournalKantian Review
    Volume22
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

    Keywords

    • action
    • agency
    • basic principles
    • character
    • maxims
    • normativity

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Do we Always Act on Maxims?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this